Home

New long-term data from the SAFE-PAD (Safety assessment of femoropopliteal endovascular treatment with paclitaxel-coated devices) study were presented today as late-breaking clinical research at the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) 2022 Scientific Sessions (19–22 May, Atlanta, USA). The analysis found no meaningful difference in survival between patients treated with a paclitaxel drug-coated device and those treated with a non-drug-coated device for up to six years after the index procedure, regardless of the patient’s mortality risk and device type.

The SAFE-PAD study was created in collaboration with the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate the long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated devices compared with non-paclitaxel-coated devices for femoropopliteal artery revascularisation among a broad, real-world population of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

The study included Medicare beneficiaries ≥66 years treated with a drug-coated device or non-drug-coated device from 1 April 2015 to 31 December 2018. Non-inferiority between devices was evaluated for mortality through 21 July 2021. A number of prespecified subgroups, including a cohort at the lowest risk of mortality defined as those aged 66–70 with no chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) and ≤2 comorbidities, were evaluated.

“Our goal is to give patients the most durable treatment possible that will keep them out of the hospital and living their lives. Patients with PAD tend to be of lower socioeconomic status, more likely to be underserved minority populations and often need to travel long distances or take time off work to seek treatment,” said Eric Secemsky (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA). “Not having access to important treatment options known to reduce the risk of repeat intervention can have a substantial influence on our PAD patients, ultimately impacting their outcomes and quality of life. The findings presented today add to the growing body of evidence showing these devices are safe for use.”

Of 168,553 patients, 70,584 (41.9%) were treated with a drug-coated device. Median follow-up was 3.52 years. The weighted cumulative incidence of mortality at 6.3 years was 63.6% with non-drug-coated devices and 62.5% with drug-coated devices (p<0.0001). Findings were consistent among all subgroups. In particular, there was no difference in risk among those at lowest risk of mortality (n=4,212; weighted hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87–1.10).

Researchers note that were will future several reports from the SAFE-PAD study with a final report published in the next two years.

Source VascularNews

Duc Tin Clinic

Chia sẽ qua facebook bài: New long-term data of paclitaxel devices continue to show no increased mortality compared to non-drug coated devices

Chia sẽ qua google bài: New long-term data of paclitaxel devices continue to show no increased mortality compared to non-drug coated devices

Chia sẽ qua twitter bài: New long-term data of paclitaxel devices continue to show no increased mortality compared to non-drug coated devices

Chia sẽ qua MySpace bài: New long-term data of paclitaxel devices continue to show no increased mortality compared to non-drug coated devices

Chia sẽ qua LinkedIn bài: New long-term data of paclitaxel devices continue to show no increased mortality compared to non-drug coated devices

Chia sẽ qua stumbleupon bài: New long-term data of paclitaxel devices continue to show no increased mortality compared to non-drug coated devices

Chia sẽ qua icio bài: New long-term data of paclitaxel devices continue to show no increased mortality compared to non-drug coated devices

Chia sẽ qua digg bài: New long-term data of paclitaxel devices continue to show no increased mortality compared to non-drug coated devices

Chia sẽ qua yahoo bài: New long-term data of paclitaxel devices continue to show no increased mortality compared to non-drug coated devices

Tin tức liên quan

Vesteck completes first-in-human use of several Suture-Tight devices

Age is just a number: Individual patient data meta-analysis probes safety of CEA in the elderly

Artificial intelligence can predict risk of complications after endovascular aneurysm repair

Bluegrass Vascular announces Journal of Vascular Surgery paper reporting use of Surfacer system

Vascular access creation: EndoAVF keeps future options open, but is not a replacement for surgical fistulas

SUPPORT CONSULTANT

Make an Appointment

I am Nguyen Thanh Sang, born in 1990. Since the examination and treatment at the clinic Duc Tin, I am very grateful to the Doctor for explaining and sharing about my illness. During the treatment time in the clinic I was very caring staff of the clinic. Now my illness has improved in a good way. Expect more and more clinic to be able to save many patients.

I sincerely thank you !. Tel: 0938303275

Huynh Thi Muoi, born in 1940, was examined and treated at Duc Tin Clinic. I am very pleased about how to serve and care patients of the clinic. The doctor is committed to explaining and sharing with the patient.

Huynh Thi Muoi sincerely thank you! Phone number: 0972868746

As I said Duc Tin surgical clinin is where my family trust, hope to visit. Physicians caring, thoughtful, gentle to the patient. Nurses and staff clinic polite, cheerful and thoughtful. This clinic clean, sterile, so I would love to. Tel: +84949914060.

The doctor is very caring, attentive and very gentle nurse, courteous, affable with me. The clinic is clean, comfortable, polite. I enjoyed this faith. Every visit I was very relieved disease. Tel: 0839820792.

I was patient, had to clinics of Dr. Le Duc Tin. I see very conscientious doctor patient care, answer any questions and very dedicated staff from the receptionist to the children tested, nursing. Clinics very clean and spacious. I'm very satisfied. Tel: +841227880829.