Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine
Ngày 07/08/2022 08:20 | Lượt xem: 167

Cardiac surgeons from North America, Europe and Latin America are among the signatories to a multidisciplinary group seeking to address what it describes as a “widening gap” between evidence and guideline recommendations in cardiovascular medicine.

INTEGRITTY—International Evidence Grading Research Initiative towards Transparency and Data Quality—is a response to the “increasing confrontations between groups with duality of interests, such as intellectual, political or financial”, founder members said in a mission statement published online.

“This has reached an unacceptable level, and major randomised controlled trials and guidelines are questioned in their credibility,” the statement goes on to add. Twenty-three cardiac surgeons and cardiologists are listed as members of the group and they include Fabio Barilli (S Croce Hospital, Cuneo, Italy), Victor Dayan (Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay), Milan Milojevic (Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade, Serbia), Rafael Sadaba (Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Spain) and John Mandrola (Baptist Health Louisville, Louisville, USA).

“The vision of INTEGRITTY is to promote and provide unbiased, critical and unconflicted evidence in cardiovascular medicine in order to aid healthcare professionals to make the best choice with patients, in compliance with the mission of academic institutions and scientific societies of pursuing consistency of knowledge and evidence-based decision-making,” the group’s statement notes. “Our scope is to appraise and evaluate evidence through a multidisciplinary team of experts, and provide  an independent description and interpretation of it.”

In the INTEGRITTY group’s crosshairs is the ongoing debate surrounding the interpretation of trial data comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with left main disease and how this should guide treatment decisions.

This has been a topic of particular debate between some sections of the cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology communities for some time. Of note, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) withdrew support for 2018 guidelines for the treatment of patients with left main coronary artery disease and stable angina. This came after a BBC investigation cast doubt on the findings of the EXCEL clinical trial, which was among the evidence used to inform the drafting of the guidelines.

Divisions were once again in evidence when the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) opted not to endorse new joint guidelines for coronary artery revascularisation, issued in late 2021.

In June, INTEGRITTY group members Alessandro Parolari (University of Milan, Milan, Italy), Rui Almeida (Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Cascavel, Brazil) and William E Boden (Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA) submitted a commentary article to European Heart Journal in response to an earlier viewpoint in the same publication from Mario Gaudino (Cornell Medicine, New York, USA), Michael E Farkouh (University of Toronto, Toronto, USA) and Gregg Stone (Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, USA). In their article, Gaudino, Farkouh and Stone had sought to reconcile evidence informing clinical decision making relating to the choice between PCI or CABG for patients with left main disease and how this should guide treatment decisions.

Parolari, Almeida and Boden write that they “strongly endorse” the creation of a new, transparent consensus document “that is rigorously and ethically configured by a meticulous and thorough revision of current guidelines on this topic and which is eventually endorsed by the vast majority of scientific cardiovascular, both cardiologic and surgical, societies”.

Parolari told Cardiovascular News that, alongside guidelines concerning ischaemic heart disease, the group will also focus on evidence from trials concerning valvular heart disease, where he said there are “several biases that have not come to surface yet”.

Source CardiovascularNews

Duc Tin Clinic

Print Chia sẽ qua facebook bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua google bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua twitter bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua MySpace bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua LinkedIn bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua stumbleupon bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua icio bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua digg bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua yahoo bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua yahoo bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua yahoo bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine Chia sẽ qua yahoo bài: Cardiac surgeons among signatories to group seeking “critical appraisal” of evidence in cardiovascular medicine

Tin tức liên quan

CUSTOMER REVIEWS

  • I am Nguyen Thanh Sang, born in 1990. Since the examination and treatment at the clinic Duc Tin, I am very grateful to the Doctor for explaining and sharing about my illness. During the treatment time in the clinic I was very caring staff of the clinic. Now my illness has improved in a good way. Expect more and more clinic to be able to save many patients.

    I sincerely thank you !. Tel: 0938303275

  • Huynh Thi Muoi, born in 1940, was examined and treated at Duc Tin Clinic. I am very pleased about how to serve and care patients of the clinic. The doctor is committed to explaining and sharing with the patient.

    Huynh Thi Muoi sincerely thank you! Phone number: 0972868746

  • As I said Duc Tin surgical clinin is where my family trust, hope to visit. Physicians caring, thoughtful, gentle to the patient. Nurses and staff clinic polite, cheerful and thoughtful. This clinic clean, sterile, so I would love to. Tel: +84949914060.

  • The doctor is very caring, attentive and very gentle nurse, courteous, affable with me. The clinic is clean, comfortable, polite. I enjoyed this faith. Every visit I was very relieved disease. Tel: 0839820792.

  • I was patient, had to clinics of Dr. Le Duc Tin. I see very conscientious doctor patient care, answer any questions and very dedicated staff from the receptionist to the children tested, nursing. Clinics very clean and spacious. I'm very satisfied. Tel: +841227880829.

Search
Customer support

    Phone: (028) 3981 2678
    Mobile: 0903 839 878 - 0909 384 389

TOP